| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Ch2_pt7

Page history last edited by Nina Simon 14 years, 5 months ago

Avoiding Prescriptive Profiles

 

    There's a downside to profiling museum visitors, and it relates to the wide range of identity-related reasons that people visit cultural institutions. As noted in his book Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience, John Falk comments that we all exhibit a complex and shifting range of identity-related needs and aspirations when we visit museums. On one museum visit, I may be accompanying my young nephews on a romp through the space, facilitating their learning experience and bopping from one novel activity to another. Another time, I may visit on my own, looking for a more leisurely, intimate opportunity to explore my own content interests. If my profile is locked in from the first visit as a woman with small children, I won't be necessarily be well-served on subsequent visits, even though I constructed the initial profile honestly and voluntarily.

    We've all had this experience on Amazon.com, which uses a strict "you are what you do" approach to profiling. You buy one collander and suddenly the system is recommending every kitchen implement under the sun. Buy a book of poetry on a whim and you'll receive reminders every time that poet spits out another verse. When the profile system is too prescriptive, recommendations become laughably inappropriate, and the whole value of personalization turns into an annoyance.

    There are several museums that have experimented with an audience-specific approaches to content, particularly in the context of pre-visit online experiences. For example, the Pittsburgh Children’s Museum’s website brings each user to a homepage where he must first self-identify as a kid, caregiver, teacher, or museum geek. The user clicks on the designation that best represents him and receives information about the museum and its offerings tailored to that audience group. For kids, the site offers games. For parents, there are family-friendly activities, public programs, and birthday party options. And for teachers, there is information about group visits. The inclusion of "museum geek" as a fourth audience is a quirky catch-all that provides institutional news and information for anyone wandering the website without a specific set of needs.

    The Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) in New York took a similar approach when redesigning their website in 2009. The redesigned site includes a bar at the bottom of the homepage that says "Welcome. Are you a... ?" When you click on the bar, you can self-identify as a first-time MOMA visitor, a returning visitor, a member, a filmgoer, exploring MOMA with a family, doing research, an educator, or a student. Selecting any of these doesn't drop you down an audience-specific rabbit hole; instead, it just alters the rotating content at the bottom of the screen to be more tailored to your particular interest.

    This flexible approach accommodates the changing identity needs of museum visitors. Self-identifying as an educator doesn't mean you can never be that first-time visitor or vice versa. You can easily switch perspectives and see the programming that is relevant to you. Similarly, on the simpler Pittsburgh Children’s Museum website, you are always one click away from the other audience offerings of the institution.

    The Tate Modern takes this concept into their physical museum with a set of pamphlets featuring different tours of the museum based on emotional mood.  Visitors can pick up the "I've just split up" tour and wallow in angst, or the "I'm an animal freak" tour and explore their wilder sides. The Tate also allows visitors to make their own tours online and bring them to the museum. Many museums are experimenting with customized personal tour development sites, but so far, usage is low. Making your own tour requires a level of pre-visit investment and creativity that is only appealing to some visitors. The Tate's pamphlet-based approach may be less personalized, but it enjoys high usage because it invites visitors to quickly select a visit starting point that in some way reflects their immediate identity needs. Because the pamphlets are pre-designed, they also serve as a very light kind of wearable identity device. Staff and other visitors can see people carrying the pamphlets and may respond to each other differently based on their affinities.

 

Continue to the next section, or return to the outline.

Comments (3)

Nina Simon said

at 8:48 pm on Nov 11, 2009

This might be a good place to add the Apartheid Museum example in where visitors are forced to enter either as WHITES or NON-WHITES. An example of a prescriptive profile whose uncomfortability is then exploited as an experience design technique...

Cath Styles said

at 2:43 am on Nov 18, 2009

Maybe it's another subsection, about being identified (as opposed to self-identification) – you could include the Holocaust Museum identity card example as well.

Nina, I'm enjoying this chapter. General comment about the commenting process: I know you want to edit it down, and I think you probably could do that, but (for me) it's not easy, in the chunked-up wiki format, to see where sections could be cut. Especially on a first read-through. I've got in the back of my mind to keep an eye out for redundant phrases, sentences, paragraphs, but I'm also enjoying your conversational style. A bit of redundancy can be good!

Sarah Barton said

at 5:39 pm on Dec 2, 2009

Another good place to mention the Spy Museum in DC, and its assumed identities for each visitor visit. This chapter is very readable. Book design to highlight case studies and examples will be very useful in helping readers to navigate.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.